Good Monday AM,
Matt Graham shared:
Last week was the 7th straight week of higher bond yields–something we haven’t seen since Q2 2009, when bonds were undergoing their first correction to the massive rally brought on by the Fed’s QE response to the financial crisis. This time around, bonds are undergoing a correction to the massive rally brought on by Covid. You’d have to go back to at least 2004 to find an 8-week sell-off, or all the way to the 80’s to find a truly obvious example. Point being: sell-offs have historically begun to collapse under their own weight when they last this long–even if that “collapsing” only amounts to a temporary reprieve. While that doesn’t guarantee we’ll end this week at lower yields than last week, the odds continue to improve. All that having been said, none of the above should affect the lock/float stance. We’re staying defensive until the market confirms a shift. So what would “confirmation of a shift” look like? Much like a syndrome vs a disease, such a shift would be defined by a certain group of symptoms as opposed to the presence of one dead giveaway. These symptoms should ideally include consecutive days with yields moving lower–preferably breaking a few of the key pivot points that were broken on the way up (1.68 and 1.62 are the clearest contenders). With yields starting out over 1.68% this week, an inability to move below that floor would send a very bearish message indeed–one that would leave us to wonder how soon we might see a test of late 2019’s highs at 1.95%. And if that seems like a long way away, just remember how far away 1.75% seemed less than a month ago.
There are several economic reports this week that would traditionally fall in the “market mover” category, but there’s no reason to suspect markets are ready to move for econ data just yet (especially in light of the absence of a reaction to last week’s big miss in Retail Sales). In terms of scheduled events, we’d give preference to the Treasury auction cycle as another opportunity for market participants to “vote” on the new yield range. Ultimately, if we make it through this week without any major correction, we might be ready to put on our “falling knife catching” gloves based on the hope for an April trade flow reversal (based in part on the end of Japan’s fiscal year, which has been a near-constant source of selling pressure in March).
A few other interesting quips:
At the end of January, there were 1.04 million homes for sale. That is down 26% from a year earlier and the lowest on record going back to 1982, according to the National Association of Realtors. Also in January, the NAR had 1.45 million members, up 4.8% from a year earlier. Selling 6.4mmm resales per years gives the average agent 4.4 sales per year… rut row.
Some 15% of people who bought homes between April and June of last year planned to have multiple generations living there, according to a survey by the National Association of Realtors. That is up from 11% of those who bought between July 2019 and March 2020, and the highest level in survey data going back to mid-2012. The joint-venture home purchase represents just one way Covid-19 has upended Americans’ living situations. Many millennials are moving back to their childhood homes, and Gen X-ers are putting in garage apartments or backyard houses for elderly parents.
Please remain safe and healthy, make today great.